A SWMS Is Not a Safety System

Worker on a roof emphasizing real site safety over SWMS
Share This Post

In February 2024, a young person on work experience fell through a skylight on a Melbourne rooftop. The fall was more than three and a half metres. They are now living with paraplegia. A Safe Work Method Statement existed. Multiple, in fact. Not a single fall protection measure was in place when they needed one.

The roofing company involved, Bowitt Group trading as Melbourne Commercial Roofing, was convicted in the Moorabbin Magistrates Court in May 2026 and fined $55,000 plus costs. The sole trader who had engaged the injured person was separately fined $50,000 the previous December. More than $105,000 in penalties between them. And behind those figures, a site that would have shut down during the WorkSafe investigation, work halted, schedules disrupted, and everyone involved managing the fallout. The financial cost of a prosecution is significant. The cost beyond that is much greater.

The SWMS existed on paper. It had identified the risks. It outlined the control measures. WorkSafe found that none of those measures were implemented on the day. That gap between what a document says and what actually happens on site is where people get seriously hurt.

Hierarcy of Control

If you are a building owner, a facilities manager, or a head contractor engaging trades to work on your building, this case raises a harder question than most people ask. Most people ask for a SWMS and tick the box. The better question is: how does this contractor resource, brief, and support their workers to actually execute what the SWMS describes?

Every worker who steps onto a roof deserves to come home. A person on work experience, carrying a roofing sheet across a job site, deserves someone in that business to have made sure the skylights were covered, the guardrails were in place, or the fall arrest points were ready to use. The paperwork does not protect anyone. The people running the job, and the systems they put in place, do that.

We highlight these risks often, because we see the gap between compliance on paper and compliance in practice. At Anchored Height Safety, we work with building owners, facilities managers, and head contractors across Victoria who want to make sure that when a trade goes up on their roof, the systems are genuinely there to protect them. We understand the pressure that comes with choosing subcontractors. Budget matters. Timelines matter. But when a WorkSafe investigation follows a serious incident, those savings disappear fast, and the non-financial cost is far greater.

When we design and install a height safety system on your building, we certify every component to the relevant Australian Standards, including AS/NZS 1891 for fall arrest and AS 1657 for fixed platforms and walkways. More than that, our documentation tells every trade who comes onto your roof exactly what is installed, what it is rated for, and when it was last inspected. There is no ambiguity. The system is there, it is certified, and the paperwork matches reality. That removes the “we will sort out the safety on the day” approach before it even starts.

When you are choosing a subcontractor for rooftop work, look past the SWMS document itself. Ask how they brief their workers before the job begins. Ask who is responsible for checking that controls are in place before work starts. Ask how they adapt the plan when site conditions change. A contractor who can answer those questions clearly understands that a SWMS is a working document, not a filing exercise. A contractor who cannot answer them probably treats it as the latter.

If a quote looks too good to be true, it usually means something is being left out. That something is often safety.

When you choose carefully and your building has a compliant, certified height safety system in place, the trades who work on your roof have a clear framework to operate within. The job gets done. The workers go home. You have documentation showing your building met its obligations. That is what it looks like when standards are genuinely applied, not just written down.

When they are not applied, the consequences go well beyond the fine. A site shuts down during a WorkSafe investigation. Schedules blow out. Insurance claims are lodged. Reputations take years to recover. And somewhere in all of that is a person whose life changed permanently because the controls that were written down were never put in place.

If you want to make sure your building gives the contractors on your roof a genuine framework to work safely within, we can help. Call us on 03 9555 3586, email us at sales@anchored.com.au, or visit anchored.com.au.

Post-storm roof safety anchor inspectionAfter the Storm: Why Your Height Safety Certification Needs to Be Ready Before You Need It
Team working on a project togetherDoing the Right Thing Is Not a Tagline. It Is How We Work

Contact Us 

Your details are 100% safe and secure with us.

About the Author: Mark Anderson

Mark Anderson
Managing Director of Anchored Height Safety, an Australian height safety specialist company, which he has led for over six years. With more than two decades of experience in automotive safety development before transitioning to height safety, Mark brings a rare depth of engineering rigour and safety systems thinking to the height safety industry. He serves on the Board of Directors of WAHA (Working at Heights Association of Australia) and is a recognised voice in shaping the compliance standards and best practices that keep Australian workers safe at height.
Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!